Why AI won’t solve your content production problems overnight

The pitch is seductive: AI can write your articles, summarise your reports, generate metadata, and even draft social posts. All at once. All the time. For publishers under pressure to do more with less, it feels like salvation. Why hire more staff when you can license a model?

But beneath the surface of that promise lies a more complicated reality. AI can increase output—but it doesn’t necessarily increase value. And for publishers dealing with overstretched teams, inconsistent quality, or unclear strategy, artificial intelligence is not a quick fix. In many cases, it risks accelerating the problems that already exist.

Before solving content production challenges, publishers need to confront a tougher question: What exactly are we producing—and why?

Output isn’t the same as impact

One of the biggest misconceptions driving AI adoption is that the main problem in publishing is speed. If we could just produce content faster, the thinking goes, we’d win more traffic, attract more subscribers, sell more ads. But in most cases, volume isn’t what’s missing—clarity is.

Publishers already churn out more content than most readers can handle. The issue is that much of it doesn’t land. It’s misaligned with audience interests, poorly targeted, or buried in duplication. AI can pump out even more—but without clear editorial priorities, it risks burying the signal further in the noise.

Content problems aren’t solved by automation. They’re solved by strategy. And AI, left unguided, doesn’t provide one.

Quality still requires judgment

AI-generated copy may be fluent, but fluency isn’t the same as quality. The best journalism isn’t just grammatically correct—it’s timely, accurate, insightful, and human. It captures tone. It makes a point. It takes a risk.

AI can mimic form, but not intent. It doesn’t know what your audience values, what your brand stands for, or why your voice is distinctive. Without editorial direction, it produces what’s statistically probable—not what’s strategically useful.

The idea that AI can “take over content production” overnight misses the complexity of the editorial process. Quality content isn’t just written—it’s shaped, debated, iterated, and refined. These are human acts, not prompts.

Scaling bad habits is still failure

In many organisations, content production challenges are symptoms of deeper structural issues: lack of alignment between editorial and commercial teams, unclear audience segmentation, poor internal workflows. AI doesn’t fix any of these. In fact, it often hides them.

You can automate templated content. But if your teams are misaligned, your strategy muddled, and your audience poorly understood, all AI will do is scale inefficiency. The result is a faster content treadmill—one that produces more, but lands with less.

For AI to be effective, publishers must first ask whether their current content model is worth scaling at all.

The illusion of instant transformation

There’s a narrative—often pushed by vendors—that AI will dramatically reduce staffing needs or turn every editor into a content factory. But publishers who adopt this mindset often face a rude awakening.

AI tools still require setup, training, integration, and human oversight. The most successful implementations involve:

  • Careful pilot testing

  • Time-intensive prompt iteration

  • Ongoing editorial review

  • Regular retraining to avoid drift in tone and accuracy

It’s not a plug-and-play solution. It’s a shift in process, mindset, and expectations. And that takes time—especially if you want to protect the integrity of your brand.

The real opportunity: focus, not volume

Used thoughtfully, AI can help solve production challenges—not by doing everything faster, but by freeing up time for editorial teams to focus on the work that actually moves the needle. Summaries, rewrites, repackaging—these are places where automation works well.

The opportunity is not to publish more, but to publish better. To spend less time formatting press releases, and more time developing exclusives. To reduce noise, and amplify the stories that define your brand.

But this only works if you have a strategy worth accelerating.

AI doesn’t fix broken workflows. It doesn’t set priorities. And it won’t solve your publishing problems overnight.

What it can do—when used deliberately—is give you space to solve them yourself.

Michael is the founder and CEO of Mocono. He spent a decade as an editorial director for a London magazine publisher and needed a subscriptions and paywall platform that was easy to use and didn't break the bank. Mocono was born.

Leave a Reply